Saturday 20 December 2014

ProtoQube is here!!!

The PCB's have finally arrived! Get them from my Tindie Store:

Tuesday 9 December 2014

PocketQube PQ60 Breakout and Prototyping board - ProtoQube!

I haven't added a blog post for a while, so I thought I'd put something out there on the PocketQube front.
I've posted various updates on the OzQube-1 Twitter and Facebook pages, but I'll try an put a bit more info around things here.

Apart from all the PCBs and subsystems I'm making for OzQube-1, I wanted to build something to promote the PocketQube PQ60 form factor, to show that it can be a versatile form factor, not only for satellites. The best way to do this is to make something that people can actually use.

So what better way than to create a breakout and prototyping board based on the PQ60 form factor!
I call it - "ProtoQube!"

The normal backplane connector for a PQ60 is a Hirose FX8C-60 (P or S, depending on whether it's the top or bottom connector). There's a few issues using it as an every-day board though:
  • The pin pitch is .6mm , so it can be a bit tricky to attach wires to the connector pins.
  • There are a choice of connector heights, so specifying one won't suit all purposes
  • It's relatively expensive ( depending on supplier, but some are over $10 each in Australia)
  • It has a limited number of insertion cycles
So I've broken out all the individual circuits to a 1.27mm ( 0.05") pitch connector along the edge of the board. The board can be used with or without a pin header. You could put some female sockets on the top of the board, just like an Arduino. 
In the middle is a regular 2.54mm (.1") pitch protoboard area. All the contacts are gold plated ( ENIG ....)
The board has footprints for both the top and bottom Hirose connector, and each circuit is passed through the board from bottom to top, so they could be used in a PQ60 stack

I'm going to be selling these for $25 through Tindie once they arrive, so send me a message or join the waitlist on Tindie if you're interested! They should be here by Christmas if I'm lucky.

Tuesday 7 October 2014

Cool PocketQube Infographic!

The PocketQube Shop and the DIY Space Exploration website have teamed up to create this fantastic PocketQube infographic.

Pocketqube spacecraft
Courtesy of: DIY Space Exploration

Thursday 4 September 2014

67P Images from Rosatta

In case you've been living under a rock, the ESA spacecraft Rosetta is currently orbiting the comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

In an attempt to involve the general public with the mission, ESA have published 4 separate Navcam images with anyone can use to combine together into a mosaic of the comet.

So here's my attempt from 4/9/2014:

Credit: ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM/Stuart McAndrew

Saturday 19 July 2014

My Hackaday Prize Entry

Many of you out there already know of the website called Hackaday. They happen to be running a competition called "The Hackaday Prize", where people are invited to submit a project that meets a very lose criteria:
  • You must actually build something
  • It must transmit data to and/or from another device (computer, phone, duplicate/variation of your device, etc). This could be over the Internet, or using any other method of your choosing.
  • Our main requirements have to do with documentation. This includes lists of parts, schematics, images, and videos. Remember, Openness is a Virtue.

So seeing as I'd just bought some of the NiceRF radio modules for testing, I thought I'd give the test board a name and enter it in the competition!

So the test board is called QubeCast Max.
(Pocket) Qube
(Broad) Cast
Max - because it's high power! And leaves room for other models in case I make more of them.

Please support PocketQube's and my entry!

Give me a skull if you like the project!

Monday 23 June 2014

PocketQube Radio Ramblings (#2)

I have just come across a new product that might be interesting to all the PocketQube builders out there (or anyone who is interested in small RF links in general).

It is a new module from a company called "Nice RF" . This is different to HopeRF , so it seems that competition is alive and well in Shenzhen, China!

The module is the RF4463F30 .

If the part number looks familiar to those in the know, it is because it is based on the Silicon Labs Si4463 Wireless IC. The difference with this module is the F30 on the end of the part number....(Sorry, had to go there :-) ) Whereas the Si4463 is rated at +20dBm output, this module adds a power amplifier to boost the output to +30dBm! That's right, one whole watt! The module costs around $18USD, and is selling on AliExpress

Now HopeRF have a similar module , the RFM23BP, based on the Si4463's predecessor, the Si4432. This module can be purchased for around $9USD from places such as Anarduino

Remember, the Si4432 is the IC inside the venerable RFM22B, as used in $50Sat, which has now been continuously operating in space for more than 6 months! While the RFM22B has an output of +20dBm, the RFM23BP has an output of +30dBm. The RFM23BP also requires a 5V supply ( but supposedly works down to 3.3V)

To work out the differences between the RFM23BP and the RF4463F30, we'll need to dig into the datasheets. Now at the moment, the datasheet for the RF4463F30 is a little sparse, so I'll have to wait til my in-depth queries are answered by their tech support people. But on the surface, the differences are as follows:

Max Data Rate: 256kbps (RFM23BP), 1000kbps (RF4463F30)
Receive mode sensitivity: -120dBm (RFM23BP), -126dBm(RF4463F30)
Note the higher sensitivity of the RF4463F30 is based on a lower bit rate and smaller frequency deviation.
Receive mode current: 25mA (RFM23BP), 10-13.5mA (RF4463F30) - which seems to have 2 different sensitivity modes - High and Low
Transmit mode current (max power): 550mA (RFM23BP), 540mA (RF4463F30)
Size: 33mmx18mm(RFM23BP), 38mmx20mm(RF4463F30)

Now as the RF4463F30 is based on the Si4463, all the software commands that apply to the Si4463 can be used on the RF4463F30. Bearing in mind that 2 of the GPIO pins are used internally in the module for antenna switching functions.

So is this new module worth double the cost of the RFM23BP? Remembering we're talking about wireless modules that cost under $20 each, but it depends on your scenario. If you need to have (relatively) high power, both modules fit the bill, with similar power output and power usage. The newcomer seems to use less on the receive side, but if you want lower power usage for receiving, you may want to get the regular Si4463 module without the high power option, as the sensitivity is the same. The HopeRF module uses a register based firmware, whereas the Si4463 uses a new API approach.

I think some testing may be in order to really understand how the modules perform.

Other Modules

Looking at the NiceRF website, they have a few other modules that use either the Si4432 or the Si4463 Wireless IC's. Another of interest is the RF4432F27  . Looks like a +27dBm version of the RFM22B. Max TX current is 350mA @ 5V ( in case 500mA is too high)
They also have some test or demo boards with built-in Microcontroller and LCD. 

All in all, it looks like there are now a few more options for ready made radio modules for PocketQube's!

Tuesday 17 June 2014

EPS Info for nanosats

Some more useful info for PocketQube builders relating to the ST SPV1040 IC. Turn out that it is being used in the US AMSAT Fox-1 Cubesat, CUBESTAR cubesat, NTNU Test Satellite ( NUTS), ESTCube-1 , and probably several others. If you read all the papers and articles about these, you should get a good idea about system designs.

This means the list of useful candidates is:

Linear Technology LTC3105
ST Microelectronics SPV1040
Spansion MB39C831QN
Texas Instruments BQ25504

They all have different features and limitations, so you'll need to look at the datasheets to make sure it's right for your project.

Tuesday 15 April 2014

PocketQube Power!

I thought the it was about time that I put something out there about the power subsystem for PocketQubes. As I've said previously, there aren't many COTS products available specifically for the PocketQube form factor. So to date, this means that everything from solar cells to EPS ( Electrical Power Systems) needs to be custom made. Cubesats are a different story. There are a myriad of vendors offering EPS boards with many different options, depending on the intended purpose and cubesat size. Clyde Space have a large range, starting from $3500.
Then there's solar cells. Once again, plenty of vendors. A common DIY cell is the Spectrolab TASC cell. This has been used in many Cubesats, including PhoneSat. The problem is that these aren't readily available outside USA

So back to a PocketQube sized budget. What are the options?

I'm sure someone will say "It depends on a range of factors........" but I like to simplify. The surface area of PocketQubes is fairly small, which seriously limits the amount of solar power that can be harnessed. So we're looking at fairly low power scenarios.

Take $50Sat for instance. The EPS board was built from regular COTS components. It is based on four LTC3105 max power point controllers, one for each solar panel, and some current measuring components etc. The solar panels themselves are TASC cells, with 6 on each of the 4 sides of the satellite. One of the other smaller sides is used by the antenna, and the other left vacant. Now I'm assuming that they are using pairs of the cells in series to generate approx 4.4V ( I could be wrong here, so don't take this as gospel), and 3 pairs in parallel. Looking at the datasheet, and based on the Max Power Point values, we're looking at 84mA, which totals approx 370mW per side. ( and yes, that's not based on the irradiance levels expected in space. Most datasheets use the terrestrial measure of 1000W/m2)

The place to look for power components here is the "Energy Harvesting" categories of the various chip makers. This is where you have to trawl through datasheets. Here's some that I've come across.

The LTC3105 is from Linear Technology. They have a few IC's in this area, but the LTC3105 seems to be a good match for PQ's in terms of input voltage range, and power efficiency. It has MPPT charging for maximum charging efficiency.
Then there's the SPV1050 from STMicroelectronics. It is also an MPPT design. It does seem limited in battery charging current though, so it may not be suitable.
Texas Instruments have a few in this area. The BQ25505 looks promising, and has a cool feature in that it can switch to a primary ( non rechargeable battery) if the rechargeable one is fully drained.
Spansion have MB39C831 . It is a little larger package than the others listed.

Ideally, you want to design the system to maximise efficiency. The diminutive size of PocketQubes

Thursday 6 March 2014

Receiving Telemetry from Satellites - DIY Style

Why would you want to?

I'm sure everyone could appreciate the reasons for satellite operators to receive the signals or transmissions from their own satellites, but why do people want to receive signals from other peoples's satellites? I'm not talking about the signals of the Satellite TV stations. I'm talking about the morse code, and other encoded data transmitted from many nanosatellites currently in orbit. 

I call it Citizen Science. And because it doesn't take a whole lot of gear to get it happening.

Alot of Cubesats and PocketQubes are from organisations that don't have the global communications networks like NASA or ESA. They are often based in a single location in a single country. Consider how often a satellite will pass within range of that location. At the altitude most nanosatellites orbit the earth, they only have line-of-sight contact with the groundstation for about 9 minutes or so.  Nanosatellites also have a limited speed that they can transfer data at. If that organisation could only transfer data from the satellite when it is in range of that single ground station, the total amount of data transferred would be very low. The satellite would have to store information from its many orbits, then try and dump all the data when it is in range. 

Now imagine if that satellite operator had ground stations spread all the way round the world. The measurements taken by the instruments onboard could be downloaded much more often. It the information was then collated, it would be much more useful.

An example at the moment is the PocketQube $50SAT. This little satellite transmits in the UHF band, at 437.505Mhz. The transmitter is only 100mw, which is pretty low compared to most small satellites. They have published a document in their dropbox account that describes how to receive their telemetry. Each transmission contains the actual realtime readings from various spacecraft sensors. If no-one receives the transmission, that info is lost. Anyone with the right gear can receive these signals and help the $50SAT team with their measurements.

Aren't HAM radio's expensive?

Good ones are, but we're going to use some modern tech that is cheap, and then you can either buy or build an antenna to your liking. It all depends on how you want to use it.

What do I need to do?

We'll use $50Sat as an example. The published communications guide contains alot of info, but before you get to that, you'll need about 5 things. A USB DVB-T Dongle, an adapter, an antenna cable, an antenna, and a computer to install a few pieces of software on.

USB DVB-T Dongle.
Often found on eBay. Search for RTL2832U or E4000. Or go to to get a list of compatible dongles. I used one like this
Antenna adapter.
 Depending on the type of dongle you purchased, you'll need to adapt the antenna connector to one more readily used for the frequencies we're interested in. Also on eBay. The connector I had was an MCX connector, so I got an MCX male to SMA Female adapter.
Now this depends on what type of antenna you're going to use as well. I'll assume for now, you're going to wave something round the lounge room, until you work out exactly how to consistently receive the transmissions. So you'll need a cable anywhere from 1-3M. The type if cable can vary. Use RG59 for short lengths, or something like LMR200 for lower cable loss. SMA Male connector on one end, and the other end will depend on your antenna. Usually it'll be an N Male. Mine was purchased with the antenna. I went with 3M of LMR200 cable.
There are many books on the subject. You could either make or buy one, depending on how keen you are. I went with a custom tuned 4 element Yagi from an Australian supplier called ZCG Scalar. The model is the Y404 . I requested the tuning for a center frequency of 437Mhz. RRP for this antenna was $199.
Here's a British Interplanetary Society article showing a few other options they are using for receiving signals from KickSats.
First, you'll need some software to use with the SDR dongle. 2 that I use are SDR# and HDSDR . SDR# has a guide on how to install the required drivers on Windows. The HDSDR site has instructions for specifics to their software.
Basically, don't let windows detect and install a driver. Click cancel to check online etc. Then run the Zadig software to associate the proper driver with the Bulk-In Interface 0. Don't worry about Interface 1.
Then put the correct dll files into the program file folder.
Like I said, just follow the instructions for the software you're going to use. You may want to read the user guides for each bit of software to become familiar with how they operate and how you set the tuning frequencies etc.

Next, you'll need to find out where the satellites are! You can do this with a program called Orbitron. Once again, read the manual for how to use it. You'll need to get the latest TLE's for the satellites from Celestrak. Orbitron has this function built in. TLE's are also known as Two Line Elements. They describe the orbital characteristics of a satellite. Load the Cubesat.txt TLE file, then select Eagle 2 from the list. This is the alternative name for $50SAT. Once selected, it will show you the current location of the satellite!
Now set your home location, then run the prediction setup and enter the required parameters. Go to the Prediction tab then press Predict. It will show you when the satellite will be in range next.

Receiving signals from space!!!!

Once you've got the hang of Orbitron and the SDR software, you're ready to track down the satellite. When Orbitron says the satellite will be in range, start the SDR software and configure it to record the raw input signal RF. This file gets big very quick!
Select LSB , and set the tuning frequency just below the frequency of $50SAT ( 437.495 ish) The exact figure doesn't matter as the dongle isn't 100% accurate, and you can adjust later.
Watch the waterfall around where you've set the tuning frequency, and with any luck, you'll see the telltale blips leading up to the RTTY transmission. You can set the tuning frequency just above the signal, so that the highlighted area covers the radio signal. The RTTY looks like 2 parallel lines running at an angle up the screen. Here's an HDSDR screenshot.

Now you can either keep recording while the satellite is in range, or move to the next step.

Decoding It!

Now here's the very low tech bit. You'll need a 3.5mm Stereo to 3.5mm Stereo cable, long enough to connect your microphone jack to the headphone jack.
Open the sound mixer on your computer and go to the input settings. Turn off any microphone boost checkboxes, and set the volume down just under 1 segment. Plug in the cable.
In HDSDR, open the WAV file you created earlier ( usually in MY Docs / HDSDR). Loop through the file and set the tuning frequency so that the whole transmission is contained within the highlighted area, then go back to just before the transmission starts, then pause the playback. Open a sound recording program, such as the built in Windows Sound Recorder. Hit record, then unpause the HDSDR playback. Look at the sound recorder to see if the audio level as high or low enough. You want it high enough so that the volume is good, but no clipping or distortion. ( Remember to unplug the headphone plug to hear the playback!!!)
If the levels are good, save the file as 48Khz , 16 bit mono audio. ( Must be mono)
Then, as described in the $50SAT comms document, you'll need another bit of software called "fldigi".
Setup the software as described in the document. One thing that isn't mentioned in the document is some settings that are visible in the latest version of the software. At the bottom left of the screen are 2 boxes with arrows either side - "Upper Signal" and "Signal Range". I set these to -28 and 17 respectively, but this can vary depending on the volume level of the output file.
Select File > Audio > Playback, then select the file you created with Sound Recorder. It should start a waterfall display down the bottom of the screen. If you've setup the software correctly, you should be able to click in the centre of the rtty transmission, and the red bars go over the red part of the waterfall plot.
If the signal is right, you should start seeing the telemetry being decoded in the top window!
You may need to manually click the centre frequency "up the slope" to get it to decode different sections of the file, in case the Auto Frequency Correction doesn't work.

Voila! You're now receiving and decoding data from a satellite.

If you validate the data correctly, submit it to the $50SAT team to add to the other reports that people are making. Hopefully you'll get a warm fuzzy feeling that you've helped someone, and a sense of achievement that you've built a functional ground station!

Monday 3 February 2014

PocketQube Radio Ramblings

As PocketQube's are pretty new on the space scene, there isn't much in the way of  COTS hardware available. You can now purchase the bus structures and ground integration jigs from PocketQube Shop , but it takes a few more components to get a fully functioning satellite!

One important area to consider is comms. How am I going to communicate with the satellite, and how is it going to communicate with the ground? For now I'll just talk about the space to ground segment hardware. I won't include discussions about licensing as that's for another time.  The spacecraft is going to need a radio and an antenna, along with sufficient power to enable the signal to reach the ground.

Out of the 4 PQ "veterans" in space, at least 2 ($50Sat and T-LogoQube) are known to have used the HopeRF RFM22B radio module. This is a tiny 16x16mm RF tranceiver module, that is capable of +20dBm output (That's 100mW for those that haven't googled it yet), in the UHF frequency range. It is based on the Silicon Labs Si4432 Radio IC. Despite the seemingly limited power output, some of the data types can be detected almost horizon to horizon - approx 2900km range! Data packets can also be decoded at up to 900km with just a 10db gain Yagi and a LNA. Not bad for a sub $25 radio module!!!!!
Compare this to Cubesat Radio systems that cost well over $5000. GomSpace sell one for 8000 EUR with a 3W transmitter. Clyde-Space have one for $8600 , with 500mW to 2W RF output.

There's a thread on the DIYsats forum here about this and other HopeRF radio modules.

So where to from here?

So the RFM22B is a proven performer for PocketQubes. Its low power requirements make it a good choice, but it does have some limitations. The data rate used by $50Sat is 1kbps. This is fine if your payload isn't very data intensive. But what are the alternatives? Here's a few areas I am looking into.

HopeRF make another module  - RFM23BP. This is similar to the RFM22B, except the power output is 500mW. The higher power should allow higher data rates. The issue with this module is the higher electrical power requirements, which can affect how the PQ power subsystem is designed.

Still on the HopeRF parts list is the RFM69HCW. This module appears similar in specification to the RFM22B, but is based on the Silicon Labs Si4463 module. Now Silicon Labs state that the Si4432 shouldn't be used for new designs, although I don't think they intended their parts to be used in space! The Si4463/RFM69HCW uses an new API style approach to programming. While touted as being simpler and more efficient, testing from the $50Sat team has so far proved otherwise.
Silicon Labs also state that a low cost external FET can be used to boost the output to 27dBm/500mW.
Testing would need to be conducted to validate this approach.
Another HopeRF product is the RFM26W . While similar again, it is described as a device that "operates as a time division duplexing (TDD) transceiver where the device alternately transmits and receives data packets."
On to the RFM96W and the RFM98W. These are based on Semtech IC's, probably the SX1276 . These have the capability of using a patented LoRa modem, which can potentially increase the devices sensitivity, and therefore link budget. Further investigation is required as this ic has duty cycle limits, and whether the LoRa function works when the radio isn't configured for spread spectrum usage.
Then there's the HM-TRP. These are possibly most commonly used in the 3D Robotics Wireless Data Module. These also have 100mW/20dBm output, but operate as a simple transparent FSK transceiver - meaning that you just feed it UART data and it converts it to RF.

Another option could be to use a FEM ( Front End Module) in conjunction with the RFM22B. RFMD make a module - RFFM6403 . This is a 1W Power amplifier, but it can also operate in Bypass mode if required. It can also be a LNA for the receiver. This part is brand new and is available now in a reel, or later in March if you need single items. Definitely worth evaluating.

Other alternatives are pre-made modules from Radiometrix. They have some compact VHF / UHF transceivers. ( maybe not as cheap as $25 though).

Then there's 2.4ghz modules........ I haven't looked that far into this, but given my intention to use a USB SDR Dongle as a groundstation, that's out of their frequency range ( although I did find an interesting article recently using some cheap hardware as a down-converter. See here for info)


The only conclusion so far is that I really need to get my Amateur radio license and start doing some testing! I've purchased some of the HopeRF modules for testing, and have made the rookie mistake of buying the bare modules, sans breakout board. Half pitch pins don't fit in normal breadboards!
Fortunately bare breakout boards for the RFM22B are available from Modtronics in Australia. Others should take my advice and get populated boards such as those from Modtronics or from Sparkfun in USA. 
As for the other modules, if you have any skills in KiCad, you can design a basic breakout and get the boards manufactured relatively cheaply from places such as Seeedstudio or Itead Studio

I'll let you know how I get along!

Sunday 19 January 2014

New DIY Space Forum

A new Forum has been started by a fellow DIY Space enthusiast.
The url is
Its a place where people of all skill and knowledge level can discuss anything related to DIY Space.

Please register and join in the ever expanding community of space enthusiasts!

Thursday 16 January 2014

How do I start to build a PocketQube?

So, you think the idea of building your own Sputnik seems pretty cool. I don't know if it's a good pick-up line at parties, but as far as personal achievement goes, it's up there. But where to start?

Disclaimer: I'm not an expert, or even qualified to give financial advice...This post is just to give potential people or teams a place to start and spur imagination and further exploration.

Back to the story. If you've got to the point of thinking that you're capable of building a satellite, you probably got at least some knowledge about what's involved. Yes? No ? I'm not going to write this "Choose your own Adventure" style, so I'll start with some basics.

You've got as far as deciding on a form factor for the satellite. PocketQube. Now, what size PocketQube are you going to build? If you know anything about getting things into space, it's not exactly cheap, and the cost is based on mass. The bigger the chassis, the larger the mass. So a 1P PocketQube is the smallest in the range, and you can go up from there, generally in .5P increments, up to 2.5P. PocketQube Shop can provide a range of off-the-shelf hardware. Or you can build it from scratch like Wren . Depends on the skills you or your team possess. You just need to ensure it complies with the PocketQube Standards.

Next. Subsystems.

There's a few critical systems you'll need to have. While they can be separate, and often are in cubesats, they may need to be integrated for a PocketQube. But as far as design goes you'll need to think about the following:
Power ( Generation and storage)
Command and Data Handling ( CDH)
Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem ( ADCS)

Now you're going to have to "hit the books", both literally and metaphorically. Each subsystem can be considered a specialist area, and there are many books on each one. Pocketqube's haven't been around for a while, so there's nothing currently written that's specific to the platform.
At the cheaper end of the scale ( less than $8), there are general books such as "DIY Satellite Platforms" by Sandy Antunes. The other end of the scale has textbooks like the "Handbook of Satellite Applications" that costs $850.
Or you could use the internet. The Cubesat standard has gone through the same progression that the PocketQube standard will undoubtedly go through. There are presentations from Cubesat Developers Workshops  . There are peer-reviewed publications . There are hundreds of PhD Thesis that can be Googled.

At the end of the day, you'll need to apply what you learn and build your satellite. There's not yet a complete turnkey COTS solution for Pocketqubes, so you'll have to roll up your sleeves! You'll need to understand each of the subsystems and devise a way to integrate them all. You'll learn things like "Link Budget" and that Lithium Polymer batteries won't charge in temperatures below 0C, and many other intricacies of building a satellite.

Testing. Do what the $50Sat team did and breadboard your satellite. At early stages, you don't need to have the final circuit board designed. You don't need the space rated solar cells for testing your control and radio code. When you get close to finalising these things, make 1 or more engineering models so you can test mechanical systems like antenna deployment.

There's definitely alot to learn if you're an amateur like me, but it's achievable. The cost of the hardware isn't exorbitant, and you just need the dedication and enthusiasm ( ok, and aptitude) to build your own satellite.

Tuesday 7 January 2014

What or Who is OzQube-1?

OzQube-1 is the name for a pico-satellite that is proposed to be designed and built as a DIY project, by a space enthusiast. It is going to be based on the PocketQube form factor. This means that it is very small as far as satellites go ( as small as 5cm³), and will not use expensive hardware.

Inspiration for this satellite came from Kickstarter, where I contributed to a project called This project showed me that it was possible to build a satellite for less than the cost of a TV. ( Launching it is another thing I'll go into another time). The Kickstarter campaign coincided with the first launch of several satellites using the Pocketqube form factor. The highlight for me was the $50sat , or Eagle2. This is a Pocketqube that was built for around $250 in parts* ( the original plan was for $50, but they opted for higher cost solar cells). This little bird has proven to be a solid, reliable platform, providing radio telemetry to radio amateurs around the world. It was a collaborative education project between Professor Bob Twiggs, ( the inventor of the cubesat and Pocketqube standards), Morehead State University in USA, and 3 radio amateurs. Have a look at the links page for more on $50sat.

It is the intention that OzQube-1 follows a similar path. The beacon and basic telemetry will be using the amateur radio bands, with an aim to make it accessible to anyone with a USB Software Defined Radio (aka USB DVB-T dongle from eBay) , some free software, and an antenna.

Now I am not an engineer, or someone that has had previous experience with building hardware for space. I'm currently an IT Professional, but I am definitely an amateur when it comes to the other skill areas required for building this craft, so I'll be learning a lot along the way. I have tinkered a bit with various mechanical and electronic systems, so I'm not completely in the dark about the challenge that lies ahead.

In addition to the amateur radio part of the craft, I've yet to formalise a plan for the main onboard computer that will function as the Command and Data Handling System, or any potential payload. I'll have more in future posts!

Friday 3 January 2014

Naming the Baby

Like with a newborn, a name is something that parents approach in different ways. Some go through the pregnancy trying to decide on a name they like. Some have a name picked out in advance, well before conception. Some wait till the baby is born before they decide on a name.

Having never been involved with the build of an actual satellite before, I was not sure what to do. I've only just decided to build a proof of concept "engineering model" PocketQube. I'm not sure what it's purpose is yet. I'm not even sure if it's something I'm capable of building. I don't know if I'll have the resources to progress the idea past a certain point.

BUT, I'll give it a shot! So while I'm formulating a plan for this endeavour, I thought it would be better if I gave it a name, so that my obsession can have a focus. ( plus it gives my wife a specific thing to refer to, rather than call me Space Geek)

I've experienced naming children, so surely this couldn't be too far removed?

So what does one do in this day and age? Well.... I emailed people and Googled names.
Being a relatively new standard, there aren't many birds flying yet, so there's not alot of risk in having the same name as an existing PocketQube. I looked at names of CubeSat's. I looked at Australia's involvement in the space industry ( didn't have to look far, but it eliminated Aussat from the list of potential names)

After all that, I wanted something simple, that referred to 2 things - Australia and PocketQubes.

The result:


(Because it could be the first of many!)

New Blog - Hooray!!!!!

I finally decided to make a home for my new obsession. After taking a vigorous "interest" in space related activities, thanks to Kickstarter and other goings on in the world like the endeavours of Curiosity and Space-X.

So, "Hello Blog World"!